Essay Topics
Types of Essays
Essay Checklist
Word Counter
Readability Score
Essay Rewriter
The BCS college football points system was introduced in 1999, the article "The BCS is anti-competitive" from Real Clear Politics says that it was used to solve some of the problems that surrounded the selection of who goes to the national championship game, along with who goes to which one of the many bowl games at the end of the season. Before the BCS points system a decade ago, it was left up to national polls to decide a national champion. You might pull for those under dog schools that have little money like Appalachian or Eastern Carolina and think they might have a chance at winning something but the fact of the matter is that they haven"t got any chance. Fans of Utah, Boise State, or even Auburn would disagree with the BCS points system. They all went undefeated in the past couple years and didn't get a shot the national title. They believe that those smaller schools should have a legitimate chance for a championship. They think it will bring in more fans and believe that a playoff will eliminate a chance of their little schools becoming completely out of the running for a national championship. There are a lot of people that would like to see a playoff system implemented. The article "Obama Tackles College Football" from the Daily Intell talks a little about how President Obama thinks that college football does need some sort of playoff system. On a Monday night game the President said "Get eight or sixteen of the top teams right at the end, you've got a playoff," so it"s obvious that even our own President thinks we need some kind of a playoff system. An article "Would a College Football Playoff be fair" from the Real Clear Politics says that the Justice Department is weighing the fact to investigate the BCS system for possibly violating anti-trust laws stated in the constitution. Utah Senator, Orrin Hatch, says that he is reviewing all options for the investigation and asked the Federal Trade Commission to get involved. The article from The College Sports Fans states that the fairness has long been neglected by the NCAA for Division 1-A Football. The BCS limits any chance for 45 of the 120 Division 1-A college football programs. With 65 teams in BCS conferences and over 90% of the BCS bowl game bids. Non-BCS teams in the WAC, Mountain West, MAC, and so on will get the short end of the stick. Another article that reinforces the idea of a playoff system is the one from The Ironton Tribune called "Bowl money stopping playoffs in college football." This article is very important because it talks about how the NCAA gets a lot of its money from the bowl games. There is a 17 million dollar payout for all the teams that are to be playing in the bowl games, so if they are paying out that much money just imagine how much money they are actually making. The millions of dollars they generate from contracts with schools and from companies to put their names on the bowl games payout too much money for the NCAA to stop doing what they are doing. There are some groups of people that don"t want to see a playoff system; in fact, they don"t want to see any changes to college football at all. According to the article "On Offense" in the Washington Wire, the BCS representatives contend that the current system better balances the preservation of the traditional bowl system, while also simplifying the system of choosing a national champion. The article in the Bleacher Report called "The case for a college football playoffs" talks about how some of the people who don"t support a playoff think that the regular season in itself is a playoff. The author doesn't think that a playoff is the same and would take some of the tradition away from the sport. The article "Teams Finish Season Happy in BCS" from the New York Times talks about what is better for the kids who actually play college football. He thinks that in a playoff system the teams that do get beat in the playoffs of other sports are just forgotten. He then says that the BCS is better for the players, at least half of them could go to a bowl game and say that they have actually won something. Then there are a very small number of people that think that there should be a kind of mixture between a playoff, the BCS points system, and the bowl games. The article called "The conservative case for college football reform, "from The Hill is a good example of this approach. Benefits from all of these options could improve funding, publicity, alumni networks, and admissions applications. Sanderson explains that benefits are largely distributed on the basic of legacy entitlements and backroom deals. By reforming the lesser-known schools would have a fair shot at earning these benefits through competition without losing the tradition of the bowl games. They would like to see a different points system used and make the bowl games part of a playoff series. "No college football, please" is another article that supports the mixture of all possible systems. In order to keep the hopes of a national title game alive a team needs to basically win every game in regular season. The "playoff" feel of the regular season is great but they should have an actual playoff at the end of the season as well. When I was growing up I always rooted for the underdog teams in just about every sport and I still do. I always seemed to feel sorry for them because they were the ones who always lost. There were teams that won every single year and teams that you knew didn't have a shot because of finances, talent of the players, or whatever it might have been. There was no parody in any of the major sports. In the NFL growing up it was the Cowboys and every time they went to the super bowl I would pull for the other team, yet it never seemed to matter. Recently in the NFL it has been the Patriots, who I absolutely despise, that have been dominating. My position on the issue is that college football should lose all of the regulations and start fresh with all options towards a playoff open. They should lose the points system all together and make the strength of the regular season equal among all of the college teams. At the end take the top 8 or 16 teams, based on their records, and then put them in a playoff series that would take place in bowl game stadiums. That way no stadium gets neglected, loses their tradition, or loses their bowl game sponsorships. As simple as this issue may look, it has some very complex ideas and it in some instances may even be looked at as being unconstitutional by breaking some of the constitutions anti-trust laws. We need to look deeply at our ideas about this issue and what the BCS is actually thinking about. Are they really thinking about the tradition of the game or are they really just thinking about the money?
Essay Writing Checklist
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction
  • Is the main idea (i.e., the writer's opinion of the story title) stated clearly?
  • Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading?
Body Paragraph
  • Does each body paragraph have a clear topic sentence that is related to the main idea of the essay?
  • Does each body paragraph include specific information from the text(including quoted evidence from the text, if required by the instructor)that supports the topic sentence?
  • Is there a clear plan for the order of the body paragraphs (i.e., order of importance, chronology in the story, etc.)?
  • Does each body paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
Conclusion
  • Is the main idea of the essay restated in different words?
  • Are the supporting ideas summarized succinctly and clearly?
  • Is the concluding paragraph interesting? Does it leave an impression on the reader?
Overall Essay
  • Is any important material left unsaid?
  • Is any material repetitious and unnecessary?
  • Has the writer tried to incorporate "voice" in the essay so that it has his/her distinctive mark?
  • Are there changes needed in word choice, sentence length and structure, etc.?
  • Are the quotations (if required) properly cited?
  • Has the essay been proofread for spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.?
  • Does the essay have an interesting and appropriate title?
Argument essay of Whether College Football Needs a Playoff
Trending Essay Topics
Explore today's trending essay topics:
Reference
Feel free to use content on this page for your website, blog or paper we only ask that you reference content back to us. Use the following code to link this page:
Terms · Privacy · Contact
Essay Topics © 2020

Argument Essay Of Whether College Football Needs A Playoff

Words: 1211    Pages: 4    Paragraphs: 5    Sentences: 50    Read Time: 04:24
Highlight Text to add correction. Use an editor to spell check essay.
              The BCS college football points system was introduced in 1999, the article "The BCS is anti-competitive" from Real Clear Politics says that it was used to solve some of the problems that surrounded the selection of who goes to the national championship game, along with who goes to which one of the many bowl games at the end of the season. Before the BCS points system a decade ago, it was left up to national polls to decide a national champion. You might pull for those under dog schools that have little money like Appalachian or Eastern Carolina and think they might have a chance at winning something but the fact of the matter is that they haven"t got any chance. Fans of Utah, Boise State, or even Auburn would disagree with the BCS points system. They all went undefeated in the past couple years and didn't get a shot the national title. They believe that those smaller schools should have a legitimate chance for a championship. They think it will bring in more fans and believe that a playoff will eliminate a chance of their little schools becoming completely out of the running for a national championship.
             
              There are a lot of people that would like to see a playoff system implemented. The article "Obama Tackles College Football" from the Daily Intell talks a little about how President Obama thinks that college football does need some sort of playoff system. On a Monday night game the President said "Get eight or sixteen of the top teams right at the end, you've got a playoff," so it"s obvious that even our own President thinks we need some kind of a playoff system. An article "Would a College Football Playoff be fair" from the Real Clear Politics says that the Justice Department is weighing the fact to investigate the BCS system for possibly violating anti-trust laws stated in the constitution. Utah Senator, Orrin Hatch, says that he is reviewing all options for the investigation and asked the Federal Trade Commission to get involved. The article from The College Sports Fans states that the fairness has long been neglected by the NCAA for Division 1-A Football. The BCS limits any chance for 45 of the 120 Division 1-A college football programs. With 65 teams in BCS conferences and over 90% of the BCS bowl game bids. Non-BCS teams in the WAC, Mountain West, MAC, and so on will get the short end of the stick. Another article that reinforces the idea of a playoff system is the one from The Ironton Tribune called "Bowl money stopping playoffs in college football. " This article is very important because it talks about how the NCAA gets a lot of its money from the bowl games. There is a 17 million dollar payout for all the teams that are to be playing in the bowl games, so if they are paying out that much money just imagine how much money they are actually making. The millions of dollars they generate from contracts with schools and from companies to put their names on the bowl games payout too much money for the NCAA to stop doing what they are doing.
             
              There are some groups of people that don"t want to see a playoff system; in fact, they don"t want to see any changes to college football at all. According to the article "On Offense" in the Washington Wire, the BCS representatives contend that the current system better balances the preservation of the traditional bowl system, while also simplifying the system of choosing a national champion. The article in the Bleacher Report called "The case for a college football playoffs" talks about how some of the people who don"t support a playoff think that the regular season in itself is a playoff. The author doesn't think that a playoff is the same and would take some of the tradition away from the sport. The article "Teams Finish Season Happy in BCS" from the New York Times talks about what is better for the kids who actually play college football. He thinks that in a playoff system the teams that do get beat in the playoffs of other sports are just forgotten. He then says that the BCS is better for the players, at least half of them could go to a bowl game and say that they have actually won something.
             
              Then there are a very small number of people that think that there should be a kind of mixture between a playoff, the BCS points system, and the bowl games. The article called "The conservative case for college football reform, "from The Hill is a good example of this approach. Benefits from all of these options could improve funding, publicity, alumni networks, and admissions applications. Sanderson explains that benefits are largely distributed on the basic of legacy entitlements and backroom deals. By reforming the lesser-known schools would have a fair shot at earning these benefits through competition without losing the tradition of the bowl games. They would like to see a different points system used and make the bowl games part of a playoff series. "No college football, please" is another article that supports the mixture of all possible systems. In order to keep the hopes of a national title game alive a team needs to basically win every game in regular season. The "playoff" feel of the regular season is great but they should have an actual playoff at the end of the season as well.
             
              When I was growing up I always rooted for the underdog teams in just about every sport and I still do. I always seemed to feel sorry for them because they were the ones who always lost. There were teams that won every single year and teams that you knew didn't have a shot because of finances, talent of the players, or whatever it might have been. There was no parody in any of the major sports. In the NFL growing up it was the Cowboys and every time they went to the super bowl I would pull for the other team, yet it never seemed to matter. Recently in the NFL it has been the Patriots, who I absolutely despise, that have been dominating. My position on the issue is that college football should lose all of the regulations and start fresh with all options towards a playoff open. They should lose the points system all together and make the strength of the regular season equal among all of the college teams. At the end take the top 8 or 16 teams, based on their records, and then put them in a playoff series that would take place in bowl game stadiums. That way no stadium gets neglected, loses their tradition, or loses their bowl game sponsorships. As simple as this issue may look, it has some very complex ideas and it in some instances may even be looked at as being unconstitutional by breaking some of the constitutions anti-trust laws. We need to look deeply at our ideas about this issue and what the BCS is actually thinking about. Are they really thinking about the tradition of the game or are they really just thinking about the money?
American Football Essay Sports Essay 
Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to rewrite this essay and remove plagiarism.
Next Sports Essay: Different Types Of Sports Fans In United States
Next American Football Essay: Football And Its Orgin

Add Notes

Have suggestions, comments or ideas? Please share below. Don't forget to tag a friend or classmate.
clear
Formatting Help
Submit