Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/essays/public_html/mods/index.php on line 1087

Warning: mysql_fetch_array() expects parameter 1 to be resource, boolean given in /home/essays/public_html/mods/index.php on line 1087
Misunderstood Information In Rolling Stone Magazine Essay
Essay Topics
Types of Essays
Essay Checklist
Word Counter
Readability Score
Essay Rewriter
In the article "Rolling Stone didn't ask the tough questions in rape report", an editorial of the "Los Angeles Times" criticizes the coverage of such a sensitive issue as rape. LA editorial emphasizes on the power of media in providing the tone of a discussion. The major argument for the stance is that journalists of "Rolling Stone" failed to take responsibility of a student rape in the University of Virginia. Journalists possess the power of speech. They are to spread the word of some of the crucial issues in the society. In the case of Rolling Stone Magazine, which is a well-read media source in America, the information was presented in a misunderstood way. Not only the fact of rape was not taken seriously with the verified analysis, but also the reporter and editorial of the "Rolling Stones" failed to verify their internal sources of information. Thus, LA editorial criticizes the approach of presented information for a number of reasons. First, the information about rape was presented without contacting people who could have provided additional information regarding the case. Moreover, the perpetrator was not identified properly. In other words, "Rolling Stones" editorial failed to provide the information regarding his background so that readers could have understood the motives for raping a student. Yet,"LA Times" mentions that the reason for choosing that particular way of presenting information was motivated by the sensitive approach. The reporter simply did not want to traumatize the victim even more by providing additional sources of being aware of the case. So, such approach may be chosen for ethical reasons. In other words, the University rape case has become a serious challenge for media representatives who enlighten and report such stances. The chosen approach in the "Rolling Stones" may be criticized for the fact that the magazine's focus is primarily based on the pop-culture. If the case of rape is met withing the pop-culture, it means a challenge for journalists, too. As they set up the tone for further discussion and public attitude towards the issue, they shall provide detailed information regarding the mention subject-matter. So, the article from "LA times" may be regarded as a call for a revision of journalist reporting of such cases and the role of journalism as such. LA times also emphasizes on the fundamental principles of the attitude towards victims in the similar cases. It appears that "Rolling Stones" and "LA Times" regard the same issue from a different perspective. Yet, one editorial manages to criticize the other as the sexual violence is an often spoken topic but the issue remains unresolved partially because inattentive attitude among journalists. LA Times editorial is aware of the challenge in front of covering sexual assault as the report is primarily based on the facts, and the victim may refuse to witness for the public of her personal abuse. Insensitive attitude and the lack of proper coverage may lead to misinterpretation and leaving the stance behind other more interesting news in the world of pop-culture. To sum up, the article in the "LA Times" is the response to the reaction "Rolling Stones" magazine in the case of sexual abuse among students. The primary argument is that the information was not provided thoroughly which lead to the lack of full understanding of the subject. Secondly, the journalist ethics may be criticized too even if taking into consideration the sensitivity of the topic. So overall, the article interprets journalist challenges in responding to such serious issues as sexual abuse.
Essay Writing Checklist
The following guidelines are designed to give students a checklist to use, whether they are revising individually or as part of a peer review team.
Introduction
  • Is the main idea (i.e., the writer's opinion of the story title) stated clearly?
  • Is the introductory paragraph interesting? Does it make the reader want to keep on reading?
Body Paragraph
  • Does each body paragraph have a clear topic sentence that is related to the main idea of the essay?
  • Does each body paragraph include specific information from the text(including quoted evidence from the text, if required by the instructor)that supports the topic sentence?
  • Is there a clear plan for the order of the body paragraphs (i.e., order of importance, chronology in the story, etc.)?
  • Does each body paragraph transition smoothly to the next?
Conclusion
  • Is the main idea of the essay restated in different words?
  • Are the supporting ideas summarized succinctly and clearly?
  • Is the concluding paragraph interesting? Does it leave an impression on the reader?
Overall Essay
  • Is any important material left unsaid?
  • Is any material repetitious and unnecessary?
  • Has the writer tried to incorporate "voice" in the essay so that it has his/her distinctive mark?
  • Are there changes needed in word choice, sentence length and structure, etc.?
  • Are the quotations (if required) properly cited?
  • Has the essay been proofread for spelling, punctuation, grammar, etc.?
  • Does the essay have an interesting and appropriate title?
Misunderstood information in Rolling Stone magazine
Trending Essay Topics
Explore today's trending essay topics:
Reference
Feel free to use content on this page for your website, blog or paper we only ask that you reference content back to us. Use the following code to link this page:
Terms · Privacy · Contact
Essay Topics © 2019

Misunderstood Information In Rolling Stone Magazine

Words: 585    Pages: 2    Paragraphs: 6    Sentences: 29    Read Time: 02:07
Highlight Text to add correction. Use an editor to spell check essay.
              In the article "Rolling Stone didn't ask the tough questions in rape report", an editorial of the "Los Angeles Times" criticizes the coverage of such a sensitive issue as rape. LA editorial emphasizes on the power of media in providing the tone of a discussion. The major argument for the stance is that journalists of "Rolling Stone" failed to take responsibility of a student rape in the University of Virginia.
             
              Journalists possess the power of speech. They are to spread the word of some of the crucial issues in the society. In the case of Rolling Stone Magazine, which is a well-read media source in America, the information was presented in a misunderstood way. Not only the fact of rape was not taken seriously with the verified analysis, but also the reporter and editorial of the "Rolling Stones" failed to verify their internal sources of information. Thus, LA editorial criticizes the approach of presented information for a number of reasons. First, the information about rape was presented without contacting people who could have provided additional information regarding the case. Moreover, the perpetrator was not identified properly. In other words, "Rolling Stones" editorial failed to provide the information regarding his background so that readers could have understood the motives for raping a student.
             
              Yet,"LA Times" mentions that the reason for choosing that particular way of presenting information was motivated by the sensitive approach. The reporter simply did not want to traumatize the victim even more by providing additional sources of being aware of the case. So, such approach may be chosen for ethical reasons. In other words, the University rape case has become a serious challenge for media representatives who enlighten and report such stances.
             
              The chosen approach in the "Rolling Stones" may be criticized for the fact that the magazine's focus is primarily based on the pop-culture. If the case of rape is met withing the pop-culture, it means a challenge for journalists, too. As they set up the tone for further discussion and public attitude towards the issue, they shall provide detailed information regarding the mention subject-matter. So, the article from "LA times" may be regarded as a call for a revision of journalist reporting of such cases and the role of journalism as such. LA times also emphasizes on the fundamental principles of the attitude towards victims in the similar cases.
             
              It appears that "Rolling Stones" and "LA Times" regard the same issue from a different perspective. Yet, one editorial manages to criticize the other as the sexual violence is an often spoken topic but the issue remains unresolved partially because inattentive attitude among journalists. LA Times editorial is aware of the challenge in front of covering sexual assault as the report is primarily based on the facts, and the victim may refuse to witness for the public of her personal abuse. Insensitive attitude and the lack of proper coverage may lead to misinterpretation and leaving the stance behind other more interesting news in the world of pop-culture.
             
              To sum up, the article in the "LA Times" is the response to the reaction "Rolling Stones" magazine in the case of sexual abuse among students. The primary argument is that the information was not provided thoroughly which lead to the lack of full understanding of the subject. Secondly, the journalist ethics may be criticized too even if taking into consideration the sensitivity of the topic. So overall, the article interprets journalist challenges in responding to such serious issues as sexual abuse.
Critical Response Essay Media Essay 
Tip: Use our Essay Rewriter to rewrite this essay and remove plagiarism.
Next :
Next :

Add Notes

Have suggestions, comments or ideas? Please share below. Don't forget to tag a friend or classmate.
clear
Formatting Help
Submit